|
Bishop of Riez (Rhegium) in Southern Gaul (Provence),
the best known and most distinguished defender of Semipelagianism, b.
between 405 and 410, and according to his contemporaries, Avitus of
Vienne and Sidonius Apollinaris, in the island of Britain; d. between
490 and 495. Nothing, however, is known about his early life or his
education. He is thought by some to have been a lawyer but owing to the
influence of his mother, famed for her sanctity, he abandoned secular
pursuits while still a young man and entered the monastery of Lérins.
Here he was soon ordained to the priesthood and because of his
extraordinary piety was chosen (432) to be head of the monastery, in
succession to Maximus who had become Bishop of Riez. His career as
Abbot lasted about twenty or twenty-five years during which he attained
a high reputation for his wonderful gifts as an extempore preacher and
for his stern Asceticism. After the death of Maximus he became Bishop
of Riez. This elevation did not make any change in his manner of life;
he continued his ascetic practices, and frequently returned to the
monastery of Lérins to renew his fervour. He was a zealous advocate of
monasticism and established many monasteries in his diocese. In spite
of his activity in the discharge of his duties as bishop, he
participated in all the theological discussions of his time and became
known as a stern opponent of Arianism in all its forms. For this, and
also, it is said, for his view, stated below, of the corporeity of the
human soul, he incurred the enmity of Euric, King of the Visigoths, who
had gained possession of a large portion of Southern Gaul, and was
banished from his see. His exile lasted eight years, during which time
he was aided by loyal friends. On the death of Euric he resumed his
labours at the head of his diocese and continued there until his death.
Throughout his life Faustus was an uncompromising adversary of
Pelagius, whom he styled Pestifer, and equally decided in his
opposition to the doctrine of Predestination which he styled
"erroneous, blasphemous, heathen, fatalistic, and conducive to
immorality". This doctrine in its most repulsive form had been
expounded by a presbyter named Lucidus and was condemned by two synods,
Arles and Lyons (475). At the request of the bishops who composed these
synods, and especially Leontius of Arles, Faustus wrote a work, "Libri
duo de Gratiâ Dei et humanae mentis libero arbitrio", in which he
refuted not only the doctrines of the Predestinarians but also those of
Pelagius (P.L., LVIII, 783). The work was marred, however, by its
decided Semipelagianism, for several years was bitterly attacked, and
was condemned by the Synod of Orange in 529 (Denzinger, Enchiridion,
Freiburg, 1908, no. 174 sqq. - old no. 144; PL.L., XLV, 1785; Mansi,
VIII, 712). Besides this error, Faustus maintained that the human soul
is in a certain sense corporeal, God alone being a pure spirit. The
opposition to Faustus was not fully developed in his lifetime and he
died with a well-merited reputation for sanctity. His own flock
considered him a saint and erected a basilica in his honour. Faustus
wrote also: "Libri duo de Spiritu Sancto" (P.L., LXII, 9), wrongly
ascribed to the Roman deacon Paschasius. His "Libellus parvus adversus
Arianos et Macedonianos", mentioned by Genadius, seems to have
perished. His correspondence (epistulae) and sermons are best
found in the new and excellent edition of the works of Faustus by
Engelbrecht, "Fausti Reiensis praeter sermones pseudo-Eusebianos opera.
Accedunt Ruricii Epistulae" in "Corpus Scrip. eccles. lat.", vol. XXI
(Vienna, 1891).
|